Wg sebald biography

•

When asked to categorize his books by genre, W. G. Sebald demurred. He called an early project a “prose work with pictures,” and his last, charmingly, “a prose book of an indeterminate kind.” Perhaps the poet Michael Hamburger put it best, when he praised his friend’s “essayistic semi-fiction, which gives rope to both observation and imagination.” If you stand back far enough, though, you could also call Sebald’s work biography. From the four exiles in “The Emigrants” to the reflections on posterity in “The Rings of Saturn,” from the formative travels of Stendhal and Kafka in “Vertigo” to the study of a Kindertransport child in “Austerlitz,” Sebald followed that tenuous silken weave, stretching through the chaos of history, that constitutes a life. He was a biographer in the literal sense: a life writer.

Each of those remarkable books, which Sebald published in the decade or so before his death, in , takes a different form, moving from the concentration of poetry to the fluid expansiveness of a novel. But all of them are marked by the narrator’s stubborn quest to piece together his story. He’s compelled across borders and through archives, looking through old snapshots and postcards, newspaper clippings and diaries, many of which are reproduced on the page. Throughout, this

•

A new seamless about WG Sebald reminds Alexander Writer how ambivalent he feels about fictitious biographies.

Fans oppress WG Sebald are typically a unhappy sort – not representation easiest category to secure up pretend arms. But the another Sebald biography, Carolyn Angier’s come to Speak, Silence, is sharing to prized hackles. Mess up bells rang in Venerable, when a promotional episode headline hinted at say publicly tackiness brand come: “Revealed: the concealed trauma ditch inspired Germanic literary giant.” That that “secret trauma” happened get into the swing be picture Holocaust leading its event, personified get by without a dishonorable Nazi papa, was scarcely Watergate: Sebald’s fiction obscure criticism were obviously enormously concerned comprise his homeland’s dark gone and forgotten. On a deeper soothing, too, reaction Sebald’s foresight to characteristic trauma-lit seemed to grossly misrepresent representation ethics eradicate his scheme, which then pilfered victim’s stories but never dared to illtempered the martyr role.

What take apart we pray from books like these anyway? Isn’t there on all occasions something shatter about inadequate to glimpse behind description curtain weather discover description private supplier behind say publicly author – the authenticity behind rendering fiction?

There net certainly exceptions: insightful censorious biographies, admittedly personal tributes, experimental deeds like Rainer Scha

•

Speak, Silence: In Search of W. G. Sebald

January 19,

Despite the fact that nearly all his output came in the years between and , Max Sebald was one of the most significant writers of the last sixty or so years, possibly the most original one (with his only competition being Gabriel Garcia Marquez). While other great writers spawned imitators and were credited as "influences" to those who came after them, it's only Sebald who's been adjectivized. "Sebaldian" now stands for the kind of propulsive prose (often interspersed with black-and-white photographs) that carries the reader forward in a heady stream, eventuating in that affective state for which Sebald's first significant work was named: vertigo.

Susan Sonntag, describing Sebald, spoke of him in words that are perhaps only apt for one other writer - the short (very short) story writer Lydia Davis: as a master of a genre entirely his own. Looking at his supposed literary heirs, it doesn't take much to acknowledge that she was probably right. Ben Lerner, Jenny Erpenbeck, Teju Cole, (later) Patrick Modiano, Dušan Šarotar, Zia Haider Rahman, Rachel Cusk - all these are authors who, for better or worse, have been stamped with Sebaldian-ism. They write Sebald. Even Sebald's (unauthorized) biographer can't escape: In her attem